SayPro Use provided templates to format research documentation in line with SayPro guidelines.

SayPro Primary Responsibility: Use Provided Templates to Format Research Documentation in Line with SayPro Guidelines

SayPro Objective

To maintain professionalism, consistency, and alignment with institutional standards, all SayPro researchers and analysts are required to use officially provided templates when preparing research documentation. This ensures that all outputs meet SayPro’s formatting, branding, and structural guidelines, allowing for clear communication and easy integration into the broader research ecosystem.

---

SayPro Key Responsibilities

1. Access Official SayPro Templates
   • Retrieve the latest approved templates from the SayPro Research Portal or internal shared drive, including:
     • Research reports
     • Topic list submissions
     • Data summary sheets
     • Policy briefs and executive summaries
     • Presentation decks
2. Follow Structural and Formatting Guidelines
   • Ensure all documentation includes required elements such as:
     • Cover page with title, author(s), and date
     • Standardized headings and subheadings
     • Approved fonts, spacing, and color schemes
     • Proper citation and reference formats
3. Maintain Branding and Consistency
   • Apply SayPro’s visual identity, including logo placement, institutional color palette, and footer formatting.
   • Ensure consistency across all documents submitted within and across teams.
4. Ensure Accuracy and Completeness
   • Use templates to structure information logically, improving clarity and coherence.
   • Double-check that all required sections are filled in and that templates are not altered in ways that compromise formatting integrity.
5. Submit Finalized Documents for Review
   • Upload completed and properly formatted documents to the SayPro database or designated review channels.
   • Ensure documents are version-controlled and easily retrievable.

---

SayPro Outcomes and Impact

• Professional and standardized research outputs across all projects
• Faster internal review and approval processes
• Enhanced readability and usability for stakeholders and decision-makers
• Reinforced institutional identity and credibility