SayPro Reviewer Information
Field | Details |
---|---|
Reviewer Name | [Full Name] |
Affiliation | [Institution/Organization] |
[Email Address] | |
Date of Review | [YYYY-MM-DD] |
Manuscript/Submission Title | [Full Title] |
Submission ID | [If applicable] |
Section 1: Overall Evaluation
Criteria | Rating (1–5) | Comments |
---|---|---|
Clarity of Writing | ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 | [Comment here] |
Originality | ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 | [Comment here] |
Scientific/Technical Rigor | ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 | [Comment here] |
Relevance to Field | ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 | [Comment here] |
Quality of Analysis/Methodology | ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 | [Comment here] |
Literature Review | ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 | [Comment here] |
Structure & Organization | ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 | [Comment here] |
References & Citations | ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 | [Comment here] |
Section 2: Detailed Comments
1. Summary of the Submission
Provide a brief summary of the work to demonstrate understanding.
2. Major Strengths
Identify the key strengths and contributions of the submission.
3. Major Weaknesses / Concerns
Identify any significant issues that need addressing, including methodological flaws, unsupported conclusions, or ethical concerns.
4. Minor Comments / Editorial Suggestions
Include any grammatical issues, formatting errors, or small clarifications.
Section 3: Recommendation
Recommendation | Select One |
---|---|
☐ Accept as is | |
☐ Minor revisions required | |
☐ Major revisions required | |
☐ Reject |
Justify your recommendation here, including an overall summary of your reasoning.
Reviewer Declaration
I confirm that I have no conflict of interest in reviewing this submission and that this review has been completed to the best of my professional ability.
Signature: ___________________________
Date: ____________________
Leave a Reply