✅ SayPro Final Monthly Output Submission Template
Month Covered: [e.g., June 2025]
Submitted By: [Full Name]
Team/Department: [e.g., Consumer Insights & AI]
Supervisor/Reviewer: [Name]
Date of Submission: [YYYY-MM-DD]
📊 Section 1: Summary of Key Metrics
| Output Type | Target | Achieved | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT Prompts Submitted | 100 | [#] | [e.g., 5 per day standard met?] |
| Total Topics Extracted | 10,000 | [#] | [100 topics/prompt × prompts] |
| Categorized Topic Sets | 100 | [#] | [Using SayPro classification] |
| Annotated Outputs Uploaded | 100 | [#] | [Via SayPro Upload Forms] |
| Peer Review Sessions Attended | 4 | [#] | [1 per week] |
| Weekly Summary Forms Submitted | 4–5 | [#] | [Include weeks covered] |
| Monthly Feedback Form Submitted | 1 | ✅ / ❌ | [Attach or link] |
📁 Section 2: Key Deliverables Attached
| File Name / Link | Type | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prompt_Log_June2025.xlsx | Excel Log | ✅ Completed | All prompt submissions + annotations |
| Topic_Extraction_June2025.xlsx | Excel Table | ✅ Completed | 100 GPT topics per prompt |
| Categorization_Sheet_June2025.xlsx | Analysis Sheet | ✅ Completed | SayPro metrics applied |
| Weekly_Summaries_June2025.pdf | Reports | ✅ Attached | 4–5 forms compiled |
| Peer_Review_Notes.pdf | Notes | ✅ Uploaded | Screenshots or summaries |
| Monthly_Feedback_Form.pdf | Form | ✅ Signed | End-of-month reflection |
| Final_Insights_Summary.docx | Narrative | ✅ Attached | Key findings + patterns |
📝 Section 3: Insight Summary (Narrative)
Briefly summarize the top 3–5 consumer behavior insights uncovered this month:
- 📌 Example 1: “AI trust levels are highest among urban millennials when product reviews are verified and human-supported.”
- 📌 Example 2: “Eco-conscious Gen Z buyers are more responsive to packaging cues than pricing for certain product categories.”
- 📌 Example 3: “Subscription fatigue is rising among middle-income users, especially for digital services without flexible plans.”
⚙️ Section 4: Workflow Reflection
1. What worked well this month?
[e.g., Improved speed in topic annotation using the new tagging tool.]
2. What could be improved?
[e.g., Standardizing peer review feedback turnaround.]
3. Tools or support needed going forward:
[e.g., Centralized prompt suggestion hub.]
✅ Submission Checklist
- All GPT prompts submitted (min. 100)
- Topics extracted, annotated, categorized
- Uploads to SayPro Website completed
- Peer reviews attended
- Weekly and monthly feedback forms submitted
- Insight summary provided
Leave a Reply