✅ SayPro Peer Review Guide
🔍 Purpose:
To evaluate the quality, clarity, and relevance of a colleague’s research, ensuring alignment with SayPro standards and offering constructive feedback.
📄 SayPro Peer Review Template
Employee Being Reviewed:
Reviewer Name:
Date of Review:
Title of Research:
Month:
1. Research Quality and Clarity
- Is the research objective clearly stated?
- Are the methods used appropriate and well explained?
- Are the results/findings clearly presented?
Comments:
2. Relevance to SayPro Objectives
- Does the research align with SayPro’s strategic focus?
- Are insights useful for business, education, or social applications?
Comments:
3. Data Integrity and Sources
- Are the data sources credible and properly cited?
- Is the analysis evidence-based and accurate?
Comments:
4. Originality and Innovation
- Does the research offer new perspectives or ideas?
- Has the author provided unique contributions?
Comments:
5. Presentation and Structure
- Is the research logically organized and easy to follow?
- Are grammar, formatting, and visuals clear and professional?
Comments:
✅ Final Rating (1–5):
- 1 = Poor
- 2 = Needs Improvement
- 3 = Satisfactory
- 4 = Good
- 5 = Excellent
Rating Given:
Overall Feedback Summary:
🧾 Peer Review Checklist
Before submission, ensure you:
- Read the entire report carefully.
- Completed all sections of the Peer Review Template.
- Provided clear, specific comments (not just general praise).
- Rated the work fairly and supported your rating.
- Uploaded the completed review
Leave a Reply